social network Dense, pragmatically accurate, it is a case study for illustrating the silent motivations behind the noisy projections. The subtle tandem that director David Fincher and screenwriter Aaron Sorkin achieve in the pace, presentation and harmony of the human drama behind the creation of Facebook. social network clean film. Enough has been mythologized about the Sorkin-Fincher collaboration regarding their idealistic approach to filmmaking and opposition to improvisation. So it’s no wonder there’s a deliberate unease in the tone of the film.
social network I never feel the breeze from the first hour. This is attributed to the fact that the film sells an experience, not a point of view. The film’s interactivity grows even more after the film ends as one loses oneself in the labyrinth of virtual echo chambers when they finally resonate with the motives behind social network. The film’s critical acclaim raises itself even a decade after its release, with social media getting in on it Frankenstein created the monster era.
Parallels between The Social Network and Citizen Kane
The last comparison between social network And Citizen Kane Lawful. Only time will tell if The social network is the citizen of the 21st century In terms of his technical and artistic contributions, however, the similarities between the motives in both films are uncanny. Charles Foster Kane, played by Orson Welles, and Mark Zuckerberg, played by Jesse Eisenberg, are the media elite of their time. They both make friends and foes along the way, as their hunger for power and status comes to an end with the third act lonely at the top.
Both films share a non-linear structure as the plot reveals the physical and emotional motivations behind its characters. The films protagonist succumbs to the self-emptiness of their latest act as they search for the missing piece, the sprout, of what started it all.
The flawless climax of both films is where cinema and philosophy meet. There is a search for meaning without the ease of guesswork. The measured abstractions of complex characters and their forgettable quest make for the information revolution social network And Citizen Kane Spiritual cousins. however, social network It has enough to classify itself as one of the best in modern filmmaking.
social network Take the irony behind Facebook
Facebook has changed the origin of human communication. As friend requests, followers, profile pictures, sharing, tagging and commenting become legitimate vocabulary in virtual communication, social network It takes viewers behind human disconnection masquerading as human connection beyond Facebook. It’s ironic that an institution that claims to connect friends started with treachery.
The film shows a satirical voice behind the lack of intimacy in what Zuckerberg saw as communication and community. Envious Zuckerberg invited Savrin to Harvard’s exclusive Phoenix Club. According to the movie, Mark’s idea of ​​social access was inspired by his own personal insecurities, social awkwardness, and desire for exclusivity.
In the first act of the movie, Erica breaks up with Mark because he was condescending towards her. Mark is depressed and blogs about her in a disrespectful manner. The movie clearly hints that Zuckerberg ended up creating Facebook because he wanted to get away from his breakup. However, the movie flips its own premise in the climax, when Mark sends Erica a Facebook friend request and obsessively flicks his screen to see if she accepts his request. His behavior echoes the Incel-like demeanor plaguing the internet as the film adds to the commentary on how Facebook was set up to help men like Mark who couldn’t face emotional vulnerability.
The paradox of viewing social connections as a product-driven, convenience-driven phenomenon and sophistry of technology is dystopia at its best. The irony also lies in the fact that it was never Mark’s idea, to begin with.
Eduardo Savarin’s Perspective and Public Influence
social network It is a quote from the book Billionaires by Accident: The Founding of Facebook, a story of sex, money, genius, and betrayal Written by Ben Mazrish. Aaron Sorkin was interested in writing the screenplay for the film after reading the book’s incomplete draft. Both authors were doing their own research while working on separate projects around the same event.
The only real-life Facebook contributor involved in the book’s development was Facebook co-founder Eduardo Savarin, whose lawsuit with Zuckerberg was still unresolved at the time. With Savarin keeping a low profile after Facebook’s success and Zuckerberg enjoying most of the limelight, the film remains the standalone from Savarin’s point of view.
One could argue that films are subject to creative freedom and that Eisenberg’s performance is anything but a fictionalized version of Zuckerberg. definitely, social network is a documentary, and it seems legit when the real-life Zuckerberg slams the film for overly portraying the characters’ obsession with girls over merely building a product. However, Mark easily shies away from talking about Eduardo Savarin and how he was never protected.
For an entrepreneur who has revolutionized communication, Zuckerberg is not a thought leader in human intimacy and mental well-being, but rather a smashing of his tech vehicle in global societal conflicts. The movie’s success continues to address the big elephant in the room when it comes to Facebook, namely the compassionate incompetence behind Facebook’s brains.
